All Posts

Foam waste might look light and harmless, but for U.S. manufacturers, it’s one of the most expensive materials to handle. Expanded polystyrene (EPS), EPE, and other plastic foams are 95% air. That means more volume, higher transportation costs, and wasted floor space in every facility that produces or processes it. What seems cheap to throw away quickly adds up to thousands of dollars in hidden costs. As a plastic foam and film densifier company in the USA, JTW International

Foam scrap is roughly 95% air. That single fact is why your disposal bill keeps climbing. Bin rental, haul-off fees, landfill charges, all of it priced by volume, all of it spent hauling mostly empty space. Meanwhile, loose foam fills warehouse floor space and burns labor hours on housekeeping that pays nothing back. A foam densifier solves this at the root. It compresses loose EPS, EPE, EPP, and PE foam into dense recyclable bricks that sell to recyclers instead of going to

For industrial foam manufacturers, densifying is the only viable solution for scaling. While balers work for cardboard, they fail with foam due to "spring-back," the material’s cellular memory that causes it to expand and break bale wires. Densifying achieves a 90:1 volume reduction ratio, turning a bulky disposal cost into a stackable, marketable commodity. If your facility is currently paying for frequent waste hauls of loose Polyethylene (PE) or Expanded Polystyrene (EPS),

Most production ceilings in extrusion and converting plants are not mechanical; they are logistical. You may have the horsepower to run your line at 800 feet per minute, but if your trim evacuation system fails at 500 fpm, your maximum velocity is effectively capped by your waste. This "Scrap Ceiling" occurs when the rate of material generation exceeds the air velocity and volumetric capacity of the conveying system. When a line accelerates, the volume and "loft" of the edge

Foam and film waste create high disposal costs because waste systems charge by volume, not weight. EPS, EPE, EPP, and PE film fill dumpsters quickly while adding very little mass. Facilities that process foam daily hit container limits long before weight limits. Many operations try a foam compactor to control volume, but compaction only squeezes air temporarily. Once pressure is released, the material expands again during staging or transport. AD Series Densifiers, engineere

Foam scrap creates one of the most persistent waste challenges in manufacturing environments. While it weighs very little, it consumes a huge amount of floor space, disrupts material flow, and increases disposal and transportation costs. Facilities that process EPS, EPE, EPP, or PE foam often find that traditional collection methods fail to keep pace with production volumes. At JTW International, we design systems that address foam scrap as an operational problem, not just a

Modern extrusion and converting plants can’t afford production slowdowns caused by scrap buildup or manual waste handling. A well-engineered Waste Material Conveying system solves that problem by automating the removal of trim and edge scrap. Continuous scrap flow means fewer stoppages, lower labor costs, and safer, cleaner operations, while feeding higher-quality material directly into downstream plastic recycling equipment. Why Manual Scrap Handling Hurts Productivity Manu

Why Smaller Augers Make More Sense Most competitors increase the auger diameter, sometimes as large as 16 inches, to move more scrap. JTW’s vacuum-assisted design achieves similar or higher capacities with 6" and 8" augers. Benefits of smaller augers include: Easier log handling: Smaller, denser logs are quicker to palletize and safer for crews to stack. Lower stress on components: Less torque demand reduces wear on drives, gearboxes, and motors. Compact footprint: Smaller ch